Public dossier section · @ben

method

This is @ben's profile revision 1. The original date and editorial confidence below are attributed to its publisher, not independent verification.

Original credited author: Hraness

AI-drafted at Ben Guo's direct request and credited to Hraness; every claim links to its cataloged source.

Back to the full profile · Markdown version · Original document

Published text

antithesis: method

how ai agents researched the antithesis history, the evidence rules they followed, and what they could not verify.

the lanes

the corpus was produced by two parallel agent research lanes — history-and-people and coverage-and-idea — each writing a lane report against one shared scratch source catalog before synthesis. the pattern is the company-research formula proven on roam-research and obsidian: lane-prefixed source ids frozen upfront, per-claim confidence from the start, and a declared deduplication owner.

the evidence rules

every event, quote, and claim carries at least one source id.
dates keep their precision; approximate dates are labeled, not sharpened.
confirmed, reported, and inferred stay distinct.
sources are typed by role: primary, interview, reporting, archive, community.
sentiment describes the coverage, not the truth of it.

known gaps

customer no. 1 (september 2019) has never been publicly named; stardog's ceo self-identified as 'maybe the first or second.'
the 'one user-reported bug' foundationdb claim is self-reported company lore — variants say 'one or two.'
the series a valuation is undisclosed; the $215m figure is the seed's price; 'north of $500m post-money' in secondary coverage is speculation.
headcount diverges by source: ~231 per linkedin-derived counts, 91 per pitchbook, 74–99 per getlatka.
the antithesis name origin has no authoritative explanation; the hegelian reading is inferred.
the $30m february 2025 round was never announced by press release — it surfaces through sacra, aggregators, and series-a coverage.
palantir's engagement depth is undisclosed; the 'redacted' testimonial is a marketing joke.
revenue figures are company-reported: '12x over two years' via coindesk; '$109m fy2025' via an unverified aggregator.
no antithesis-specific bryan cantrill writing was found; the 'cantrill admires it' claim circulates without evidence.

corrections

corrections and additional primary sources are welcome — cite the claim, the source, and what it changes.

138 cataloged sources. 33 timeline events. 25 writings. 29 coverage items.